flexopmaat

Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can anticipate the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With up to date news and a small however spirited 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to respond to humanity's hardest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain lots of pressing concerns that are less simple to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be better at predicting the future (and have seen some appealing improvements - research paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is really on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months ago so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown territory to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following questions to our AI and evaluated its response. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop wagering at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll look at the essential points from the posts. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the odds and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, considering all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, prawattasao.awardspace.info now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and lespoetesbizarres.free.fr method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The post points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I also need to think of the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might change their defense accordingly, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number but possible given their confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the possibility that they'll use it a number of times, specifically if it's effective early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or ghetto-art-asso.com any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems considerable since it shows he's done it in the past, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he's less likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which may give him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any controversial tunes in the performance. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements during the halftime show, so there's a danger that such material may be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold carry on big phases. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which may provide him more imaginative freedom. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the likelihood appears to be moderately high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't suggest to cause offense which he actually found it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who enjoys eating, particularly with his group. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and thinks anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical data that might influence this forecast.

First, I check out the articles provided. They all discuss the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has come up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a huge difference.

However, I remember that the result of a coin toss is generally considered random. The slight historic edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making predictions, clashofcryptos.trade sometimes people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I need to think about whether this historic bias must affect the likelihood.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historical data shows a small preference for tails, it's not statistically substantial sufficient to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists however does not override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the very same. BUT, its official now due to the fact that our AI states the opportunities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to fraud on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the probability that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that talk about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable employ current video games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ridiculous." They state there's no proof of methodical predisposition. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're denying it, it may imply there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more considering that 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer penalties, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely very low. Maybe not zero since you can't eliminate every possibility, but extremely unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the video game ends up before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hi, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.