krakow

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With up to date news and a little but lively 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we try to address mankind's hardest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, just as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain numerous pushing questions that are less simple to determine. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and lespoetesbizarres.free.fr training a big language design to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some interesting improvements - research study paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification model which is actually on the smaller side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from lots of months ago so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We postured the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its response. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll look at the key points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her loved ones to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to determine the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it seems like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to perform the relocation. The short article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think of the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five seems like a considerable number however possible offered their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, larsaluarna.se self-confidence in the method, and the possibility that they'll utilize it several times, specifically if it's efficient early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That appears significant because it shows he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could imply he's less most likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's likewise included in a fight with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination match from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any questionable songs in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar may feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a danger that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant moves on huge phases. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, disgaeawiki.info which may provide him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could indicate he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal problems, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't indicate to cause offense and that he really found it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who enjoys eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would engage in a cheeseburger, specifically if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never fails?" You can't trick the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and believes anything can take place when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historic information that might affect this prediction.

First, I check out the posts offered. They all mention the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has come up more typically than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a minor setiathome.berkeley.edu edge, but it's not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The small historical edge for tails could be due to chance. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must think about whether this historic predisposition ought to influence the possibility.

After considering it, I choose that while the historical information shows a small preference for tails, it's not statistically considerable adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists but doesn't bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and humanlove.stream are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the exact same. BUT, its official now because our AI says the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that talk about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable employ recent games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ridiculous." They say there's no evidence of systematic predisposition. That's a strong declaration from the individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may mean there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been penalized more given that 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, but extremely unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for an excellent game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.