From 6a6afe082321e28568bfb0c7551dd4ef7e481b5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amado Deschamps Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:50:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update 'Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do' --- ...what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md diff --git a/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a26a6e --- /dev/null +++ b/Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their [jobs](http://www.thehealthwork.com). The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be permitted to take leave and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an [employment](https://jobs.askpyramid.com) lawyer who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM's delayed [resignation](https://vnfind24h.com) program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don't consider it a lot an offer. I believe it's a demand to resign with a vague promise that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months - but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for [pattern-wiki.win](https://pattern-wiki.win/wiki/User:ShaniceWanliss) as much as eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I believe that's a really misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you think about a buyout, there's usually some sort of composed agreement or a concrete offer to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout extreme care. There are no guarantees consisted of in this email. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency's most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have major [botdb.win](https://botdb.win/wiki/User:RedaMonzon9) consequences, potentially, [wakewiki.de](https://www.wakewiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:RubenMais061049) on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for people who don't wish to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: [funsilo.date](https://funsilo.date/wiki/User:MelinaGeyer3227) This is a recommendation to federal workers that they need to return in - to work. And if they don't, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is extremely generously using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: [disgaeawiki.info](https://disgaeawiki.info/index.php/User:KiaraBaird50) It just - in a way, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work really tough to resign. I believe it's attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals's eyes due to the fact that there are no assurances. And these are individuals who love their job. They enjoy the mission of the firm. They work hard. And today, they're dealing with [extremely tough](https://letsstartjob.com) choices, particularly if they're remote. I suggest, it's very coercive.MARTIN: You say it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're somebody who lives in Oregon and [yogicentral.science](https://yogicentral.science/wiki/User:LindaTindall411) has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you obstacles simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I'm not sure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I'm not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase agencies to provide this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite possibly setting the phase for challenges because I feel OPM has significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.
+
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website terms of use and approvals pages at www.npr.org for additional information.
+
NPR records are developed on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its final form and may be upgraded or modified in the future. [Accuracy](http://gloveworks.link) and accessibility may vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio record.
\ No newline at end of file